Sotto pushes guidelines on senators’ extended unauthorized absences
MANILA, Philippines — Senate President Pro Tempore Vicente “Tito” Sotto III has filed a resolution seeking to establish clear guidelines for addressing senators’ prolonged unauthorized absences.
Sotto said such absenteeism and neglect of duty “are deemed a waste of taxpayer funds and have caused public clamor over the past months.”
In Senate Resolution No. 751, filed on Oct. 27, Sotto recommended that the Senate Committee on Rules institutionalize measures to address prolonged unauthorized absences by members of the upper chamber.
READ: Gatchalian: Absent, detained, at-large senators forgo salaries
The resolution noted that several complaints against senators over their absences had been filed with the Senate Committee on Ethics.
However, Sotto said the Senate Rules have no provision on how to address the matter, which he described as “of paramount public interest.”
READ: Dela Rosa called on to forgo Senate pay and perks over absences
“Public office is public trust,” Sotto stressed in the resolution, underscoring the obligation of public officials to remain accountable to the Filipino people and perform their duties with “responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency.”
Several senators have been absent from Senate sessions, including Sen. Loren Legarda, who has been on medical leave since Aug. 3, and Sen. Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa, who has been in hiding amid an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court.
Senators Jinggoy Estrada and Rodante Marcoleta have also been unable to attend sessions after the Sandiganbayan ordered their 90-day preventive suspension in connection with the plunder charges they face.
Sotto’s resolution seeks to refer the matter to the Committee on Rules for further study and the establishment of appropriate guidelines.
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of Cebudailynews. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
