Court orders BIR to give SMB P761.06M tax refund
The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has ordered the Bureau of Internal Revenue to issue a P761.06-million tax refund to San Miguel Brewery, Inc., for erroneously collected tax on its light-branded beer for the year 2012.
The CTA Second Division’s 33-page decision dated June 9 is the latest ruling in favor of the San Miguel Corp. subsidiary, which contests the BIR’s imposition of a higher tax on its San Mig Light product.
The BIR had considered San Mig Light a “variant” of the older Pale Pilsen brand and obliged SMB to pay a tax of P20.57 per liter. SMB argued San Mig Light should have been taxed as a “new brand” at only P15.49 per liter.
The tax court did not even have to elaborate why SMB was entitled to the refund on the excessive tax payments. It had issued at least four en banc decisions in favor of SMB from September 2012, the decision noted.
“It has been consistently ruled that ‘San Mig Light’ is a new brand and not a variant… Consequently there was an erroneous, excessive and/or illegal assessment and collection in the amount of P5.08 per liter removal of petitioner’s ‘San Mig Light,’”SMB was bound to get such a hefty refund because it shipped out a total of 149.82 million liters from its five plants nationwide in 2012.
Previous rulings explained that reclassifying San Mig Light as a “variant” would violate Republic Act No. 9334, which prohibits the BIR from revising the classification of brands registered from 1997 to 2003.
Since the BIR initially granted San Mig Light’s registration as a new brand in October 1999, only Congress can reclassify the beer for taxation purposes.
The court previously ruled that San Mig Light should not be considered a variant of “Pale Pilsen”—an older brand of beer with more calories but with the same 5 percent alcoholic content—because these words were not contained in the former’s name.
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of Cebudailynews. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.