VP Sara Duterte also flagged by House Panel
House panel: Former President Duterte to be liable for crimes against humanity for his drug war
MANILA, Philippines — The sweeping report of the House quad committee also did not let Vice President Sara Duterte escape as the panel also called for her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, to be held liable for crimes against humanity for his vicious drug war.
The Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) was asked by the House panel to further investigate the alleged joint bank accounts of the former President and his daughter, VP Duterte, “as alleged by former Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV, containing funds coming from an alleged drug lord, Sammy Uy.”
This is among the recommendations in the panel’s 51-page report.
This could also compound VP Sara Duterte’s political woes as she is already facing three impeachment complaints and a separate inquiry by the House committee on good government for her alleged misuse of confidential funds as Vice President and as former education secretary.
READ MORE:
Act on impeach raps vs Sara, House urged
Raymond Garcia: ‘I won’t let any national concerns affect Cebu City’
Drug money
The quad committee cited Trillanes’ testimony about bank accounts shared by the Dutertes, into which millions of pesos were transferred regularly by Uy, one of Duterte’s election campaign contributors.
From 2011 to 2013 alone, Trillanes claimed that the Dutertes received more than P133 million: P14.88 million was transferred to Vice President Sara Duterte’s account, P15.65 million to the former President, P41.2 million to Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, and P42.6 million to Cielito “Honeylet” Avanceña.
Some of the deposits were based on managers’ checks that were traced to Uy, who was later identified by confessed hit man Arturo Lascañas as a drug lord in his affidavit before the International Criminal Court (ICC).
“That’s why we concluded that this war on drugs is fake to protect his syndicate, which includes (former presidential economic adviser) Michael Yang, Sammy Uy, and Charlie Tan,” the former senator said during one of the quad committee’s hearings.
Duterte himself denied the accusations and even said he was willing to execute a bank waiver after being dared again by Trillanes.
He later backtracked and said he would only do so if Trillanes hung himself.
Testifying before the House panel, Duterte also said that he would take “full legal, moral responsibility” for his administration’s bloody war on drugs.
Wider probe
The recommendations are all contained in the progress report submitted by the megapanel chaired by Surigao del Norte Rep. Robert Ace Barbers during Congress’ last working day, Dec. 18.
Among others, the report said Duterte, along with his allies Senators Christopher “Bong” Go and Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa, should be held accountable for crimes against humanity for leading the brutal campaign that claimed thousands of lives over his six-year term.
The same report, a copy of which was obtained by the Inquirer, also called for further investigation into the Vice President’s brother, Davao Rep. Paolo Duterte, for his alleged involvement in a so-called Davao Mafia involved in the drug trade as alleged by former Customs insiders Jimmy Guban and Mark Taguba.
When Barbers read his sponsorship speech, however, he only mentioned that the panel recommended further investigation into, among others, Uy for his alleged involvement in the drug trade.
He did not name Sara Duterte or the bank accounts even though the call for AMLC to further investigate was part of the roster of recommendations to address “extrajudicial killings.”
Based on official reports, the war on drugs left at least 6,000 people dead.
However, data from human rights watchdog Karapatan showed that at least 30,000 drug suspects were summarily killed, 422 political activists were summarily executed, and 544 cases of frustrated extrajudicial killings.
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of Cebudailynews. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.