The perennial problem of hunger

By: Mahar Mangahas - @inquirerdotnet - Columnist/Philippine Daily Inquirer | January 21,2023 - 08:20 AM

In 2022, 12 percent of Filipino families experienced hunger at least once in the previous three months (“Fourth Quarter 2022 Social Weather Survey: Hunger moves from 11.3% to 11.8%,” www.sws.org.ph, 10/19/2023). The December 2022 round was SWS’ 100th survey of hunger, since 1998.

The national hunger rate was steady last year, according to the SWS surveys of April, June, October, and December. To me, this steadiness indicates no visible effect on hunger of the increases in prices of some foods, like onions, eggs, or sugar, at least as of the fourth quarter; it might be otherwise if the price of rice had increased.

What is new is that, for the first time after six quarters, the National Capital Region is no longer the hungriest of the four SWS survey areas (see “Prolonged hunger in NCR,” inquirer.net, 11/5/2022). The hungriest became Mindanao, followed by Visayas, at the end of 2022. Let us now see what 2023 will bring.

The average hunger rate in 2022 was slightly below 2021’s 13 percent, and far below 2020’s catastrophic 21 percent, the first pandemic year. It was almost, but not quite, a full recovery from the 9 percent hunger rate in pre-pandemic 2019.

A single-digit hunger rate is actually rare; this may be seen in the full data series in every SWS quarterly hunger report. It previously happened only twice: in 1999 (8 percent) and in 2003 (7 percent). Unlike poverty, hunger does not have a long-term downward trend. It remains a perennial problem.

The 2005-2016 hump in hunger. In the earliest hunger surveys of 1998-2004, the hungry only ranged between 7 and 12 percent of families. But then it steadily rose to the teens, with the annual average going from 14 percent in 2005 to 19 percent in 2010. It hit a peak of 20 percent in 2011-2013, for three long years.

Then hunger subsided to 18 percent in 2014, and then 13 percent in 2015-2016. The average rate finally left the teens in 2017 (12), 2018 (11), and 2019 (9). The lengthy hump in hunger was generally unnoticed by development analysts, perhaps because it did not affect the financial sector.

Econometric modeling of hunger at the UP School of Statistics (UPSS). Using the SWS quarterly data, UPSS researchers Dennis S. Mapa, Fatima C. Han, and Kristina Claire O. Estrada showed that an increase in food prices in one quarter would raise hunger for five subsequent quarters, while an increase in underemployment would raise it for two quarters (“Hunger incidence in the Philippines: facts, determinants and challenges,” paper for a forum of the National Academy of Science and Technology, 2/10/2010).

I think the UPSS econometricians examined the gross domestic product and other potential determinants and found little correlation with them. I hope they will update their analysis with data after 2010, including the pandemic time. (Mapa has been head of the Philippine Statistics Authority since 2019, by the way.)

The drastic effect of the pandemic. In the first year of the pandemic, the hunger percentage zoomed to 17 in May, 21 in July, and 31 in September—when hungry families were 28 percent in the National Capital Region, 24 percent in Balance Luzon, 41 percent in Visayas, and 38 percent in Mindanao—before dropping to 16 in November.

In 2020, hunger averaged 21 percent, a new annual peak. I see the mushrooming of community pantries as a systemic response of Filipino society to the intense suffering that finally became obvious to all.

Hunger is an embarrassing subject. Whereas the government now has monthly surveys on unemployment and underemployment and has promised to update its poverty figures every two years, instead of every three, it has hardly any numbers on hunger.

The latest government hunger report I could find is for reference year 2011, which happens to be the peak of the hunger hump as reckoned by SWS. The report said that 6.3 percent of families in the nation had experienced hunger in the past three months. It had hunger rates for 17 regions, including NCR (2.7 percent), Cordillera (the least hungry, 0.3 percent), and 15 others. The regions with double-digit percentages were Eastern Visayas (16.2), Northern Mindanao (10.1), SOCCSKARGEN (13.0), and Caraga (11.7).

For the past dozen years now, the government has not surveyed hunger. The target date for Zero Hunger (United Nations Sustainable Development Goal No. 2) is 2030, only seven years away. Does the government expect to achieve it by then?

——————

Contact: [email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Read Next

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of Cebudailynews. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

TAGS: Cebu Daily News, cebu news, Filipino families, hunger, Mindanao, National Capital Region, national hunger rate, Social Weather Stations, Visayas
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our regional newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.