Go: Recto Bank incident should be discussed diplomatically
MANILA, Philippines — The ramming of a Filipino fishing boat by a Chinese vessel at Recto Bank needs to be discussed by the Philippines and China in a “diplomatic manner,” incoming Sen. Christopher “Bong” Go said Monday.
“Should there be findings that there was a deliberate act to harm the Filipino fishing boat, the perpetrators should be made to answer,” Go said in a statement.
Go said the government’s stand was to “diplomatically work” with the Chinese government to investigate the matter “fairly,” to “impose certain measures,” and to “impose sanctions” against those responsible.
According to him, the government is waiting for the result of the ongoing investigation of both governments to determine whether the incident was a maritime accident or an intentional act on the part of the Chinese vessel.
“We also want to determine whether or not there was an UNCLOS violation relative to giving aid to a vessel in distress — and assuming that the Chinese vessel did depart after the incident, whether or not it was justified to do so,” Go explained.
UNCLOS stands for the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
He assured, however, that government officials were addressing the issue.
Go noted how Malacañang had called on the Chinese government to investigate the incident, while the Department of Foreign Affairs had filed a diplomatic protest.
He also said President Rodrigo Duterte had been monitoring the situation.
“Rest assured, tinututukan ito ni Pangulong Duterte at ng buong gobyerno natin upang maipaglaban ang karapatan ng mga Pilipino sa tama, maayos at diplomatikong paraan,” he said.
[Rest assured, President Duterte and the whole government is closely monitoring this so we could defend the rights of Filipinos in a correct, orderly and diplomatic way.]
(Editor: Alexander T. Magno)
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of Cebudailynews. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.